4.6 Article

Response Surface Optimization of an Extraction Method for the Simultaneous Detection of Sulfamethoxazole and 17β-Estradiol in Soil

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules25061415

关键词

antibiotics; hormone; ultrasound-assisted extraction; HPLC-UV; response surface methodology

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0800704]
  2. SUES Sino-foreign Cooperative Innovation center for City Soil Ecological Technology Integration [2017PT03]
  3. First-rate Discipline Construction of Applied Chemistry of Shanghai University of Engineering Science [2018xk-B-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibiotics and hormones widely exist in fertilizers and manures, which are excessively used in agriculture and animal husbandry. Considering their potential harm to the environment and human health, the detection of antibiotics and hormones has become a necessity. However, current methods find it difficult to simultaneously extract and detect antibiotics and hormones in soil and to maintain a high level of accuracy and a low cost. In this study, a straightforward, convenient, and simultaneous extraction and detection method of a representative antibiotic (sulfamethoxazole, SMZ) and hormone (17 beta -Estradiol, E2) in soil has been established. Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) was used in the pretreatment process and high-performance liquid chromatography with the ultraviolet detector (HPLC-UV) method was then chosen in the detection process. By means of single factors and response surface experiments, optimal extraction conditions were a 41-mL buffer solution (pH 4.27) mixed with 1 g of soil sample, an ultrasonication time of 36 min, an ultrasonication temperature of 25 degrees C, and two extraction cycles. The detection limits of 0.3-10 mu g/kg and quantification limits of 1-30 mu g/kg have been obtained. Finally, the optimized simultaneous extraction and detection method was validated by three different real soil samples with recoveries ranging from 79.49% to 86.47%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据