4.7 Article

CAVIAR: Context-driven Active and Incremental Activity Recognition

期刊

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
卷 196, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105816

关键词

Activity recognition; Mobile computing; Semi-supervised learning; Context-awareness; Hybrid reasoning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activity recognition on mobile device sensor data has been an active research area in mobile and pervasive computing for several years. While the majority of the proposed techniques are based on supervised learning, semi-supervised approaches are being considered to reduce the size of the training set required to initialize the model. These approaches usually apply self-training or active learning to incrementally refine the model, but their effectiveness seems to be limited to a restricted set of physical activities. We claim that the context which surrounds the user (e.g., time, location, proximity to transportation routes) combined with common knowledge about the relationship between context and human activities could be effective in significantly increasing the set of recognized activities including those that are difficult to discriminate only considering inertial sensors, and the highly context-dependent ones. In this paper, we propose CAVIAR, a novel hybrid semi-supervised and knowledge-based system for real-time activity recognition. Our method applies semantic reasoning on context-data to refine the predictions of an incremental classifier. The recognition model is continuously updated using active learning. Results on a real dataset obtained from 26 subjects show the effectiveness of our approach in increasing the recognition rate, extending the number of recognizable activities and, most importantly, reducing the number of queries triggered by active learning. In order to evaluate the impact of context reasoning, we also compare CAVIAR with a purely statistical version, considering features computed on context-data as part of the machine learning process. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据