4.7 Article

Model-free and model-based kinetic analysis of Poplar fluff (Populus alba) pyrolysis process under dynamic conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
卷 143, 期 5, 页码 3419-3438

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-020-09675-y

关键词

Poplar fluff; Thermogravimetry; Pyrolysis; Three-step consecutive reaction; Fragmentation; Modulated TG simulation

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Poplar fluff was chosen as a representative biomass feedstock to analyze its pyrolysis properties. The most appropriate kinetic model for the thermal decomposition of Poplar fluff sample was found to be the non-dimensional acceleratory Avrami-Erofeev model for a three-step consecutive reaction mechanism. The pyrolysis process of Poplar fluff involves fragmentation reactions and diffusion-controlled devolatilization.
As representative among biomass feedstocks, Poplar fluff was chosen to analyze the pyrolysis properties of this new biofuel. Thermogravimetry under inert (argon) atmosphere at the heating rates of 5, 10, 15, and 20 degrees C min(-1)was employed in the investigation of thermal processing of studied biomass. The determination of kinetic parameters and estimation of reaction mechanism function were done through application of the state-of-the-art NETZSCH Kinetics NEO software. With this aim, the various model-free models and model-based calculations were implemented. The obtained results showed that the most appropriate kinetic model to describe the thermal decomposition of Poplar fluff sample wasn-dimensional acceleratory Avrami-Erofeev model (An) for three-step consecutive reaction mechanism. Governed reaction pathway in pyrolysis process represents fragmentation reactions which arise from levoglucosan decomposing that permits permanent gases and refractory tars, where diffusion-controlled process is involved in the sample devolatilization. The modulated and multiple-step predictions of pyrolysis process were also carried out.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据