4.7 Article

Role of sludge volume index in anaerobic sludge granulation in a hybrid anaerobic reactor

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 283, 期 -, 页码 338-350

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.07.058

关键词

Anaerobic granulation; Sludge Volume Index (SVI); Denaturing Gel Gradient Electrophoresis (DGGE); Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR); Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

资金

  1. Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work focuses on microbial granulation in hybrid anaerobic reactors CHAR). Five HARs were used in two sets of experiments and all were seeded with the same inoculum. The volume of inoculum added was 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% and 50% in the first and 13%, 15%, 18%, 23%, and 27% in the second set of experiment. The volume of inocula added affects the sludge volume index, which in the present study proves to be important parameter for granulation. The results suggest that if SVI during the reactor start-up is kept between 150 and 210, reactors were able to form granules. Outside this range in the present set-up, no granulation was observed due to increased biomass wash-out, causing decreased SRT. Higher methane production was achieved in reactors with good granulation. The DGGE profiles show that the non-granulating systems had lesser diversity, due to increased wash out. Archaeal profile gave better correlation for granulation. Granulating reactors were rich in aceticlastic methanogens over hydrogen utilizing groups, especially Methanosaetaceae. Both Methanosarcina and Methanosaeta are required for better granulation as confirmed quantitatively. Bacterial profile of granulating reactors were rich in acetogens. SEM (Scanning electron microscopy) pictures show that granules are dominated by Methanosaeta-like microbes. Thus, the sludge characteristics at the start-up are of vital importance as they influence the sludge quality developed during the reactor operation and also the microbial communities retained. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据