4.6 Article

Numerical simulation on the formation and merging of ablation plasma in two exploding aluminum wires

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/ab8b06

关键词

exploding wires; counter-streaming plasma flows; magnetohydrodynamics simulation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51807050]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [E2019202297]
  3. Program for the Top Young and Middle-aged Innovative Talents of Higher Learning Institutions of Hebei [BJ2017038]
  4. DOE NNSA-ASC OASCR Flash Center at the University of Chicago

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, computational results characterizing the formation and merging of counter-streaming interpenetrating plasma flows formed in exploding double parallel aluminum wires are presented. A radial magnetohydrodynamic computation is carried out first to obtain the parameters of core-corona structure in individual wires, providing an initial condition for the planar magnetohydrodynamic model in a multi-species fluids scheme with two-temperature treatment of plasma. In the XY plane, two aluminum plasma clouds are surrounded by extremely thin air, which represents a vacuum environment. A long-lasting compressed layer of extremely thin air in the central region of the inter-wire gap is formed before the merger of aluminum plasma flows. The accordance between the increasing mass fraction of aluminum plasma species in the central slit and the enhancement in self-emission light demonstrates that the real physical characteristics of extremely low-density vacuum environment plays an important role in merger of aluminum plasma flows. Current density is concentrated in the central column during the merging process of counter-streaming interpenetrating aluminum plasma flows, evolving from a structure of bifurcated current sheets into a single narrow sheet. Efficient numerical investigation on the interaction between counter-streaming plasma flows requires the incorporation of surrounding fluid species of extremely thin air.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据