4.5 Article

Quantifying Protein-Protein Interactions in Molecular Simulations

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 124, 期 23, 页码 4673-4685

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b11802

关键词

-

资金

  1. Max Planck Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interactions among proteins, nucleic acids, and other macromolecules are essential for their biological functions and shape the physicochemcial properties of the crowded environments inside living cells. Binding interactions are commonly quantified by dissociation constants K-d, and both binding and nonbinding interactions are quantified by second osmotic virial coefficients B-2. As a measure of nonspecific binding and stickiness, B-2 is receiving renewed attention in the context of so-called liquid-liquid phase separation in protein and nucleic acid solutions. We show that K-d is fully determined by B-2 and the fraction of the dimer observed in molecular simulations of two proteins in a box. We derive two methods to calculate B-2. From molecular dynamics or Monte Carlo simulations using implicit solvents, we can determine B-2 from insertion and removal energies by applying Bennett's acceptance ratio (BAR) method or the (binless) weighted histogram analysis method (WHAM). From simulations using implicit or explicit solvents, one can estimate B-2 from the probability that the two molecules are within a volume large enough to cover their range of interactions. We validate these methods for coarse-grained Monte Carlo simulations of three weakly binding proteins. Our estimates for K-d and B-2 allow us to separate out the contributions of nonbinding interactions to B-2. Comparison of calculated and measured values of K-d and B-2 can be used to (re-)parameterize and improve molecular force fields by calibrating specific affinities, overall stickiness, and nonbinding interactions. The accuracy and efficiency of K-d and B-2 calculations make them well suited for high-throughput studies of large interactomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据