4.2 Article

Surface-Modified Graphene Oxide with Compatible Interface Enhances Poly-L-Lactic Acid Bone Scaffold

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOMATERIALS
卷 2020, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2020/5634096

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51935014, 51905553, 81871494, 81871498, 51705540]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2019JJ50774, 2018JJ3671, 2019JJ50588]
  3. Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [20192ACB20005]
  4. Guangdong Province Higher Vocational Colleges and Schools Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme (2018)
  5. Open Sharing Fund for the Large-Scale Instruments and Equipments of Central South University
  6. Project of Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department [2017RS3008]
  7. Project of Science and Technology of Jiangxi Provincial Education Department [GJJ190465]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene oxide (GO) usually serves as a reinforce phase in polymer because of its superior mechanical strength and high specific surface area. In this work, GO was grafted with L-lactic acid monomer (denoted as GO@PLLA) to overcome the aggregation in matrix and then incorporated into the poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) scaffold fabricated by selective laser sintering. In hybrid scaffold, GO@PLLA exhibited uniform dispersion in the matrix. Furthermore, mechanical interlock between GO@PLLA and PLLA matrix formed and reinforced the interface bonding. On the other hand, the heterogeneous distributed GO acted as effective nucleating agent and resultantly enhanced the crystallization. Results showed that the tensile and compressive strength of scaffolds increased by 143.3% and 127.6%, respectively. Meanwhile, the scaffold exhibited an increased degradation rate of 37.9%, which could be attributed to the abundant hydrophilic functional groups on GO. Moreover, the scaffold exhibited favorable bioactivity and biocompatibility. Herein, the developed hybrid scaffold showed potential capacity for bone tissue engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据