4.7 Article

Bioisosteric Discovery of NPA101.3, a Second-Generation RET/VEGFR2 Inhibitor Optimized for Single-Agent Polypharmacology

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 63, 期 9, 页码 4506-4516

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01336

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [1R01CA197178-01A1R, 1R01CA194094-010]
  2. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS)
  3. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC)
  4. Francis Crick Institute
  5. Cancer Research UK [FC001115]
  6. UK Medical Research Council [FC001115]
  7. Wellcome Trust [FC001115]
  8. Association for Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Disorders MTC Research Fund
  9. Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [P20 GM109005]
  10. UAMS Seeds of Science cancer research grant
  11. American Thyroid Association (ATA/Thyca)
  12. POR Campania FESR 2014-2020 SATIN grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RET receptor tyrosine kinase is a driver oncogene in human cancer. We recently identified the clinical drug candidate Pz-1, which targets RET and VEGFR2. A key in vivo metabolite of Pz-1 is its less active demethylated pyrazole analogue. Using bioisosteric substitution methods, here, we report the identification of NPA101.3, lacking the structural liability for demethylation. NPA101.3 showed a selective inhibitory profile and an inhibitory concentration 50 (IC50) of <0.003 mu M for both RET and VEGFR2. NPA101.3 inhibited phosphorylation of all tested RET oncoproteins as well as VEGFR2 and proliferation of cells transformed by RET. Oral administration of NPA101.3 (10 mg/kg/day) completely prevented formation of tumors induced by RET/C634Y-transformed cells, while it weakened, but did not abrogate, formation of tumors induced by a control oncogene (HRAS/G12V). The balanced synchronous inhibition of both RET and VEGFR2, as well the resistance to demethylation, renders NPA101.3 a potential clinical candidate for RET-driven cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据