4.8 Article

Taxane resistance in prostate cancer is mediated by decreased drug-target engagement

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 130, 期 6, 页码 3287-3298

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI132184

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [P01 CA163227, SPORE P50 CA090381, R01 CA196996]
  2. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT
  3. NCI [R01 CA179100, R21 CA216800]
  4. NCI SPORE in Prostate Cancer [1P50 CA211024]
  5. Department of Defense [PC180637]
  6. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute at Harvard Medical School
  7. Sanofi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite widespread use of taxanes, mechanisms of action and resistance in vivo remain to be established, and there is no way of predicting who will respond to therapy. This study examined prostate cancer (PCa) xenografts and patient samples to identify in vivo mechanisms of taxane action and resistance. Docetaxel drug-target engagement was assessed by confocal anti-tubulin immunofluorescence to quantify microtubule bundling in interphase cells and aberrant mitoses. Tumor biopsies from metastatic PCa patients obtained 2 to 5 days after their first dose of docetaxel or cabazitaxel were processed to assess microtubule bundling, which correlated with clinical response. Microtubule bundling was evident in PCa xenografts 2 to 3 days after docetaxel treatment but was decreased or lost with acquired resistance. Biopsies after treatment with leuprolide plus docetaxel showed extensive microtubule bundling as did biopsies obtained 2 to 3 days after initiation of docetaxel or cabazitaxel in 2 patients with castration-resistant PCa with clinical responses. In contrast, microtubule bundling in biopsies 2 to 3 days after the first dose of docetaxel was markedly lower in 4 nonresponding patients. These findings indicate that taxanes target both mitotic and interphase cells in vivo and that resistance is through mechanisms that impair drug-target engagement. Moreover, the findings suggest that microtubule bundling after initial taxane treatment may be a predictive biomarker for clinical response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据