4.7 Article

Co-estimation of state of charge and state of power for lithium-ion batteries based on fractional variable-order model

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 255, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120203

关键词

Fractional-order model; Co-estimation; State of charge; State of power; Lithium-ion batteries

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51977131, 51877138]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy [KF2020]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [19ZR1435800]
  4. Shanghai Science and Technology Development Fund [19QA1406200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a co-estimation scheme of the state of charge (SOC) and the state of power (SOP) for lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles based on a fractional-order model (FOM). First, a series of FOMs and integer-order models ([OMs) is constructed using fractional- and integer-order calculus. The model parameters are then identified using particle swarm optimization over the whole SOC range, and the complexity and accuracy of the resulting models are evaluated. Second, a fractional-order extended Kalman filter-based SOC estimator is developed. Third, the co-estimation of SOC and SOP is formulated, and an SOP estimation method based on three restrictions and a correction method from constant-current to constant-power are proposed. Finally, the proposed model and method are verified by experiments. The main results are as follows: (1) The FOMs achieve better accuracy than FOMs over the whole SOC range (especially in the low SOC range), and the FOM with a pair of resistance-constant phase elements and one Warburg element (FO-2RCW) producing the best performance. (2) The SOC estimation accuracy based on the FO-2RCW with variable parameters and orders is less than 2% over the whole SOC range. (3) The proposed co-estimation method is validated to be effective under the dynamic operating conditions and shows high accuracy. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据