4.7 Review

Progress in modelling solidification microstructures in metals and alloys. Part II: dendrites from 2001 to 2018

期刊

INTERNATIONAL MATERIALS REVIEWS
卷 66, 期 1, 页码 30-76

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09506608.2020.1757894

关键词

Dendrites; flow effects; rapid solidification; fragmentation; columnar-to-equiaxed transition; dendrite spacings; segregation; interdendritic precipitation; grain competition; cell growth; phase-field model; multiscale simulation; X-ray imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article provides the first account of the history of modelling dendritic and cellular solidification, reviewing progress up to the year 2000 and highlighting advances in modelling capabilities developed in the early years of the present century. It also discusses in-situ X-ray observations of solidification of metallic alloys.
This is the first account of the history of modelling dendritic and cellular solidification. While Part I reviewed the progress up to the year 2000 [Kurz W, Fisher DJ, Trivedi R. Progress in modelling solidification microstructures in metals and alloys: dendrites from 1700 to 2000. Intern Mater Rev. 2019;64:311-354], Part II retraces our modelling capabilities developed during the early years of the present century. Advances in in-situ X-ray observations of solidification of metallic alloys are also presented. While the most important contributions are mentioned, the authors are aware that such a historical review must leave many worthy articles by the wayside. This overview considers dendrite tip growth and morphology, rapid solidification, melt flow, fragmentation, columnar-to-equiaxed transition, dendrite spacings, coalescence, grain competition, and cellular growth. Modelling across the length scales from nano- up to macroscopic solidification phenomena by massive phase field computations or multiscale approaches show the potential for the simulation of real processes such as additive manufacturing, single crystal casting, welding or advanced solidification processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据