4.6 Review

Progress and prospects of biomarkers in primary liver cancer (Review)

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
卷 57, 期 1, 页码 54-66

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2020.5035

关键词

hepatocellular carcinoma; intrahepatic cholangio-carcinoma; combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma; biomarker; cell signaling; drug resistance

类别

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Special Program of the 13th Five-Year Plan for the Prevention and Control of Major Infectious Diseases such as AIDS and Viral Hepatitis [2018ZX10302205-005]
  2. Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research [2018-1-1151]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81672026]
  4. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7192084]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumor biomarkers are important in the early screening, diagnosis, therapeutic evaluation, recurrence and prognosis prediction of tumors. Primary liver cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors; it has high incidence and mortality rates and seriously endangers human health. The main pathological types of primary liver cancer include hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and combined HCC-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC). In the present review, a systematic outline of the current biomarkers of primary liver cancer is presented, from conventional blood biomarkers, histochemical biomarkers and potential biomarkers to resistance-associated biomarkers. The important relationships are deeply elucidated between biomarkers and diagnosis, prognosis, clinicopathological features and resistance, as well as their clinical significance, in patients with the three main types of primary liver cancer. Moreover, a summary of several important biomarker signaling pathways is provided, which is helpful for studying the biological mechanism of liver cancer. The purpose of this review is to provide help for clinical or medical researchers in the early diagnosis, differential diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of HCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据