4.6 Article

Caloric Restriction in Older Adults-Differential Effects of Weight Loss and Reduced Weight on Brain Structure and Function

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 1765-1778

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhw008

关键词

aging; hippocampus; nutritional intervention; resting-state fMRI; VBM

资金

  1. ICEMED consortium (Helmholtz Society)
  2. Clinical Research Unit of the Berlin Institute of Health (BIH)
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Fl 379-8/1, Fl 379-10/1, Fl 379-11/1, DFG-Exc 257, KFO218/2]
  4. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [FKZ 01EO0801, 01GQ1424A, 01GQ1420B]
  5. Charite Clinical Scientist Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dietary modifications such as caloric restriction (CR) have been suggested as a means to improve memory and prevent agerelated decline. However, it is unclear whether those effects remain stable over time or are related specifically to negative energy balance during the weight loss phase of CR. Using a randomized interventional design, we investigated changes in recognition memory and neural correlates in postmenopausal obese women (n = 19): 1) after intense weight loss in the course of a 12-week low-caloric diet (reduced body weight and negative energy balance) and 2) after having sustained the reduced weight over 4 more weeks (reduced body weight, but energy balance equilibrium). Participants were contrasted to a control group (n = 18) instructed not to change dietary habits. In the CR group, we found improved recognition memory, paralleled by increased gray matter volume in inferior frontal gyrus and hippocampus, and augmented hippocampal resting-state functional connectivity to parietal areas. Moreover, effects were specific for transient negative energy balance and could not be detected after subsequent weight maintenance. Our data demonstrate for the first time in humans that beneficial effects of CR on brain structure and function are due to weight loss rather than an overall reduced weight.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据