4.3 Article

Estrogenic hazards of short chain phthalates and bisphenols found in cosmetic products

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09603123.2020.1749573

关键词

Phthalates; bisphenols; estrogenic activity; cosmetics; test YES

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For several years, the influence of endocrine disruptors on reproduction and development has been a concern. This study examined the estrogenic activity of five phthalates and two bisphenols in finished products using the Yeast Estrogen Screen system. Only short-chain phthalates and bisphenols showed estrogenic activity, regardless of the estrogen receptor. The risk of agro-food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical products was also evaluated before and after aging, with only two cosmetics showing increased hazard with aging. The results were consistent with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis, confirming the routine use of the YES system for evaluating estrogenic hazards in finished products.
For several years, environmental exogenous agents, called endocrine disruptors, are suspected to interfere with the essential functions of reproduction and development in many living organisms. In this study, endocrine disruptors including five phthalates and two bisphenols contents in finished products were assayed and their estrogenic activity were measured by using the Yeast Estrogen Screen system with respect to human and trout estrogen receptors hER alpha and rtER(S). Independently of the estrogen receptor, only short-chain phthalates (DBP and BBP) and the two bisphenols exhibited an estrogenic activity. Besides, the risk of three end-products (agro-food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical) was evaluated before and after forced aging. Only two cosmetics the face cream and the perfume presented a hazard which increases with aging. These results are consistent with the compounds identified by Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. These findings confirmed that the YES system can be routinely used to evaluate the estrogenic hazards within finished products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据