4.7 Article

A neighborhood rough set model with nominal metric embedding

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 520, 期 -, 页码 373-388

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.02.015

关键词

Attribute reduction; Neighborhood rough set; Metric learning; Nominal data

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [213]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [61673301, 61502259]
  3. Major Project of Ministry of Public Security [201700 04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rough set theory is an essential tool for measuring uncertainty, which has been widely applied in attribute reduction algorithms. Most of the related researches focus on how to update the lower and the upper approximation operator to match data characteristics or how to improve the efficiency of the attribute reduction algorithm. However, in the nominal data environment, existing rough set models that use the Hamming metric and its variants to evaluate the relations between nominal objects can not capture the inherent ordered relationships and statistic information from nominal values due to the complexity of data. The missing information will affect the accuracy and validity of the data representation, thereby reducing the reliability of rough set models. To overcome this challenge, we propose a novel object dissimilarity measure, i.e., relative object dissimilarity metric(RODM) that learned from nominal data to replace the Hamming metric and then construct a psi-neighborhood rough set model. It extends the classical rough set model to a robust, representative, and effective model which is close to the characteristics of nominal data. Based on the psi-neighborhood rough set model, we propose a heuristic two-stage attribute reduction algorithm(HTSAR) to perform the feature selection task. Experiments show that the psi-neighborhood rough set model can take advantage of more potential knowledge in nominal data and achieve better performance for attribute reduction than the existing rough set model. (c) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据