4.6 Article

Thiourea-Based Extraction and Deposition of Gold for Electroless Nickel Immersion Gold Process

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 59, 期 16, 页码 8086-8092

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c00493

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [NRF-2017M3A7B4042273]
  2. Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017M3A7B4042273] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gold electroless plating for surface finishing of electronic circuits, named electroless nickel immersion gold (ENIG), is widely practiced in the electronics packaging industry. Noncyanide substitutions of the current cyanide bath for immersion gold are being sought for environmental and safety reasons. Herein, as a promising option, a bath using a noncyanide gold complex, Au(I)-thiourea, was developed. The kinetics of gold deposition were estimated with respect to gold concentration, thiourea concentration, pH, and temperature; the transfer coefficient of gold concentration and activation energy were found to be 0.697 and 36.69 kJ.mol(-1), respectively. In addition, the quality of gold coating in terms of corrosion resistance was verified by electrochemical analysis. The relationship between particle size and corrosion resistance of the coating was confirmed by morphology observation through scanning electron microscopy and Tafel plots. The corrosion potential of the gold layer with thiourea was found to be -62 mV, close to that of the layer using a thiosulfate-sulfite bath, with an advantage of faster deposition rate. The results suggest Au(I)-thiourea can serve as an eco-friendly and field-implementable option for the ENIG process, helping to realize a closed-loop process of gold: recovering the precious metal from electronic wastes and reusing it in new products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据