4.7 Article

Preparation of hierarchical leaf-like cobalt and enhanced magnetic properties by a new low-temperature synthesis method

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 42, 期 10, 页码 12092-12096

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.04.139

关键词

Magnetic properties; Powders: Chemical preparation; Microstructure; Cobalt

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51403148]
  2. Foundation of Suzhou Science and Technology Project [SYG201530]
  3. Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province
  4. Outstanding Young Teacher of Suzhou University of Science and Technology
  5. Foundation of Shanxi Province Key Laboratory of Functional Nanocomposites, North University of China [NFCM201608]
  6. Jiangsu Undergraduate Training Programs for Innovation and Entrepreneurship [201510332058X]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hierarchical leaf-like cobalt materials have been synthesized by a simple method at relatively low temperature. The product was characterized by means of XRD, SEM, EDS, and VSM techniques. The effects of temperature and cobalt acetate amount on the final Co were investigated by a series of experiments. It was found that the temperature played an important role in the formation of such novel leaf-like cobalt. When the reaction temperature of the mixture was as low as 40-65 degrees C, the morphology of final products can be changed from fluffy like to leaf like hierarchical structures. The leaf-like cobalt possessed hexagonal close-packed (HCP) phase structure. The hierarchical leaf-like cobalt exhibited high saturation magnetization (M-s) of 151.6 emu/g and coercivity (H-c,) of 158.5 Oe. The low temperature chemical reduction method is quite simple, it will provide possibility for large scale preparation of such leaf-like cobalt. Due to the specific structure and magnetic properties, these cobalt leafs are expected to have potential applications as candidates for microwave absorption and sensors. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd and Techna Group S.r.l. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据