4.7 Article

Pyrolysis-compound-specific hydrogen isotope analysis (δ2H Py-CSIA) of Mediterranean olive oils

期刊

FOOD CONTROL
卷 110, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.107023

关键词

Analytical pyrolysis; Deuterium/hydrogen isotope analysis; Extra virgin olive oil; Geographical origin; Py-CSIA

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [Arimnet2/0001/2015]
  2. European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) [PTDC/AGRPRO/2003/2014]
  3. INTERCARBON project [CGL2016-78937-R]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [ARIMNET2/0001/2015] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The analysis of the hydrogen stable isotope composition (delta H-2) of organic compounds provides information about its geographical origin. In this work, delta H-2 composition of specific compounds released by direct analytical pyrolysis (Py-CSIA) of extra virgin olive oils EVOOs was studied avoiding the use of any chemical and/or physical treatments, derivatization or previous separation steps. A collection of EVOOs from Mediterranean countries (Portugal, Spain, France, Tunisia and Turkey) was used for authentication of the olive oil samples. The delta H-2 value for 9 pyrolysis compounds present in all EVOOs, ranged between -112 and - 267 mUr. These compounds were selected as possible surrogate descriptors linked to the olive oil geographic origin. Principal Component Analysis showed that delta H-2 was highly correlated with geographical longitude and annual temperature. Multiple Linear Regression analysis revealed that delta H-2 value of pyrolysis compounds can significantly (P < 0.05) predicts longitude, mean annual temperature and distance to the sea. The results suggest that the methodology used has a high potential to assess EVOOs geographic origin. This is the first report that evaluates delta H-2 directly from the pyrolysis products of olive oil using Py-CSIA. The approach used represents an innovative, fast, reproducible and reliable authentication technique.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据