4.5 Article

Experimental investigation on lateral ceiling temperature distribution induced by wall-attached fire with various burner aspect ratios in underground space

期刊

FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103055

关键词

Underground space; Wall-attached fire; Temperature rise; Aspect ratio; Flame extension length

资金

  1. National Nature Science Funds of China [51776060]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [PA2019GDQT0014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lateral ceiling temperature distribution induced by wall-attached fires with various burner aspect ratios in underground spaces was experimentally investigated. Different aspect ratios of rectangular gas burners were found to result in varying lateral ceiling temperature distributions, with an increase in burner aspect ratio leading to higher temperatures at specific locations below the ceiling.
The lateral ceiling temperature distribution induced by wall-attached fires with various burner aspect ratios in underground space have been experimentally investigated with a specially designed test rig of 1:8 scale. A series of tests were conducted with rectangular gas burners with different aspect ratios set close to the side wall, different fire heat release rates and fire source-ceiling height. The ceiling temperature profile and lateral ceiling flame extension length under the ceiling were recorded and analyzed in detail. The results show that the lateral ceiling temperature distribution induced by rectangular burners with different aspect ratios is quite different. The temperature for a given horizontal location in the lateral direction below the ceiling increases with the increase of the burner aspect ratio. A new correlation is proposed with modified characteristic diameter. Its predictions are in reasonably good agreement with the present measurements as well the previous measurements of the others which were not used in its derivation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据