4.7 Article

Towards automatically filtering fake news in Portuguese

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 146, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113199

关键词

Fake news; Text categorization; Natural language processing; Machine learning; Corpus construction

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2017/09387-6, 2018/02146-6]
  2. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) [001]
  3. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  4. Research Office of the University of Sao Paulo [668]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the last years, the popularity of smartphones and social networks has been contributing to the spread of fake news. Through these electronic media, this type of news can deceive thousands of people in a short time and cause great harm to individuals, companies, or society. Fake news has the potential to change a political scenario, to contribute to the spread of diseases, and even to cause deaths. Despite the efforts of several studies on fake news detection, most of them only cover English language news. There is a lack of labeled datasets of fake news in other languages and, moreover, important questions still remain open. For example, there is no consensus on what are the best classification strategies and sets of features to be used for automatic fake news detection. To answer this and other important open questions, we present a new public and real dataset of labeled true and fake news in Portuguese, and we perform a comprehensive analysis of machine learning methods for fake news detection. The experiments were performed using different sets of features and employing different types of classification methods. A careful analysis of the results provided sufficient evidence to respond appropriately to the open questions. The various evaluated scenarios and the drawn conclusions from the results shed light on the potentiality of the methods and on the challenges that fake news detection presents. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据