4.7 Article

The critical voltage of a GPL-reinforced composite microdisk covered with piezoelectric layer

期刊

ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS
卷 37, 期 4, 页码 3489-3508

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00366-020-01004-z

关键词

Piezoelectric layer; GPLRC; Electrically characteristics; Microdisk; Compatibility equations; GDQM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research investigates the electrical characteristics of a graphene nanoplatelet-reinforced composite microdisk and the effect of various parameters on the critical voltage of the system. The study shows that increasing the outer-to-inner radius ratio has a more pronounced impact on the critical voltage of the smart structure compared to increasing the graphene weight fraction.
In this research, electrically characteristics of a graphene nanoplatelet (GPL)-reinforced composite (GPLRC) microdisk are explored using generalized differential quadrature method. Also, the current microstructure is coupled with a piezoelectric actuator (PIAC). The extended form of Halpin-Tsai micromechanics is used to acquire the elasticity of the structure, whereas the variation of thermal expansion, Poisson's ratio, and density through the thickness direction is determined by the rule of mixtures. Hamilton's principle is implemented to establish governing equations and associated boundary conditions of the GPLRC microdisk joint with PIAC. The compatibility conditions are satisfied by taking perfect bonding between the core and PIAC into consideration. Maxwell's equation is employed to capture the piezoelectricity effects. The numerical results revealed the important role of ratios of length scale and nonlocal to thickness, outer-to-inner ratio of radius (R-o/Ri()), ratio of piezoelectric to core thickness (h(p)/h), and GPL weight fraction (g(GPL)) on the critical voltage of the system. Another important consequence is that by increasing R-o/R-i, the critical voltage of the smart structure increases more intensely in comparison with the g(GPL).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据