4.7 Article

Energy management strategy for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle integrated with vehicle-environment cooperation control

期刊

ENERGY
卷 197, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117192

关键词

Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles; Adaptive equivalent consumption minimization strategy; Equivalence factor; Model predictive control; Vehicle-environment cooperative control

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51805201]
  2. International Clean Energy Talent Program (iCET 2019) of China Scholarship Council [201904100052]
  3. Excellent Young Teachers Training Program of Jilin University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Energy management strategies have been proven to be instrumental in fully realizing the potential of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs). This paper proposes an improved adaptive equivalent consumption minimization strategy (IA-ECMS). In an IA-ECMS, the equivalence factor (EF) can be tuned in real time due to integration with the results of the vehicle-environment cooperative control. This study's main contributions are twofold. First, a novel A-ECMS is developed, in which the EF tuning method is carefully designed based on the results of a correlation study. The study results reveal that EF is determined by the future driving behaviour and the current component status. To ascertain the future driving behaviour, a method based on participatory sensing data (PSD) is used to implement the vehicleenvironment cooperative control. Second, a comparative study of the IA-ECMS and the energy management strategy based on the existing model of predictive control (MPC) is performed. The comparison results show that the application process of the IA-ECMS is similar to that of the MPC-based method except for two main differences. The simulation results demonstrate that the presented IA-ECMS approach could outperform in fuel economy the conventional A-ECMS (CA-ECMS) method. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据