4.8 Article

Cdh1 regulates craniofacial development via APC-dependent ubiquitination and activation of Goosecoid

期刊

CELL RESEARCH
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 699-712

出版社

INST BIOCHEMISTRY & CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2016.51

关键词

APC; Cdh1; Wwp2; Goosecoid; Sox6; craniofacial development; craniofacial anomalies

资金

  1. Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) [2014CB964704, 2015CB964503]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [31371463]
  3. NIH [GM089763, GM094777, CA177910]
  4. National Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars' (NSFC) [81322027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Craniofacial anomalies (CFAs) characterized by birth defects of skull and facial bones are the most frequent congenital disease. Genomic analysis has identified multiple genes responsible for CFAs; however, the underlying genetic mechanisms for the majority of CFAs remain largely unclear. Our previous study revealed that the Wwp2 E3 ubiquitin ligase facilitates craniofacial development in part through inducing monoubiquitination and activation of the paired-like homeobox transcription factor, Goosecoid (Gsc). Here we report that Gsc is also ubiquitinated and activated by the APC(Cdh1) E3 ubiquitin ligase, leading to transcriptional activation of various Gsc target genes crucial for craniofacial development. Consistenly, neural crest-specific Cdh1-knockout mice display similar bone malformation as Wwp2-deficient mice in the craniofacial region, characterized by a domed skull, a short snout and a twisted nasal bone. Mechanistically, like Wwp2-deficient mice, mice with Cdh1 deficiency in neural crest cells exhibit reduced Gsc/Sox6 transcriptional activities. Simultaneous deletion of Cdh1 and Wwp2 results in a more severe craniofacial defect compared with single gene deletion, suggesting a synergistic augmentation of Gsc activity by these two E3 ubiquitin ligases. Hence, our study reveals a novel role for Cdh1 in craniofacial development through promoting APC-dependent non-proteolytic ubiquitination and activation of Gsc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据