4.4 Review

Environmental mixtures and children's health: identifying appropriate statistical approaches

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN PEDIATRICS
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 315-320

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000877

关键词

high-dimensional exposure data; mixture analysis; susceptible windows

资金

  1. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) [R01MD013310]
  2. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) [R01ES028811, P30ES023515]
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [K23HL135349]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Biomonitoring studies have shown that children are constantly exposed to complex patterns of chemical and nonchemical exposures. Here, we briefly summarize the rationale for studying multiple exposures, also called mixture, in relation to child health and key statistical approaches that can be used. We discuss advantages over traditional methods, limitations and appropriateness of the context. Recent findings New approaches allow pediatric researchers to answer increasingly complex questions related to environmental mixtures. We present methods to identify the most relevant exposures among a high-multitude of variables, via shrinkage and variable selection techniques, and identify the overall mixture effect, via Weighted Quantile Sum and Bayesian Kernel Machine regressions. We then describe novel extensions that handle high-dimensional exposure data and allow identification of critical exposure windows. Recent advances in statistics and machine learning enable researchers to identify important mixture components, estimate joint mixture effects and pinpoint critical windows of exposure. Despite many advantages over single chemical approaches, measurement error and biases may be amplified in mixtures research, requiring careful study planning and design. Future research requires increased collaboration between epidemiologists, statisticians and data scientists, and further integration with causal inference methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据