4.6 Article

Multi-Keyword ranked search based on mapping set matching in cloud ciphertext storage system

期刊

CONNECTION SCIENCE
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 95-112

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09540091.2020.1753175

关键词

Cloud storage system; ciphertext retrieval; outsourced encrypted data; semantic extension; mapping set matching

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61672338, 61873160]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a ciphertext multi-keyword ranked search scheme based on mapping set matching (MSMR), which improves retrieval efficiency by matching keyword numbering sets between private cloud server and public cloud server. Experimental results show significant improvement in retrieval efficiency as data scale increases.
Most of the existing outsourced encrypted data schemes are retrieved based on the query keyword entered by authorised users. However, with the increase of the data scale in the cloud storage system, the retrieval efficiency of existing solutions has not been significantly improved. In this paper, a multi-keyword ranked search scheme for ciphertext based on mapping set matching (MSMR) is proposed, where (1) The private cloud server matches the keyword numbering set corresponding to the document index vector and the keyword numbering set corresponding to the query vector and sends the document identifier of the matching keyword numbering to the public cloud server. The public cloud server filters the documents irrelevant to the query request according to the document identifier corresponding to the matching keyword numbering, which effectively reduces the time spent in calculating the correlation score, and (2) the document index vector and query vector are segmented before encrypting them out, reducing the time to construct such vectors. Theoretical analysis shows that the proposed scheme is secure in the known ciphertext model. Experimental results confirm that whenever the data scale grows, the improvement of MSMR retrieval efficiency is more significant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据