4.7 Article

Analytical solution for nonlinear consolidation of combined electroosmosis-vacuum-surcharge preloading

期刊

COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103484

关键词

Vacuum-surcharge preloading; Electroosmosis; Nonlinearity; Vertical drains; Consolidation

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019B11214]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1765205]
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201806715020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, analytical solutions of the consolidation of vertical drains combined with electroosmosis-vacuum-surcharge preloading are derived considering void ratio-dependent compressibility, hydraulic permeability and permeability of electroosmosis. In addition, radial and vertical flow, changes of the hydraulic and electroosmosis permeabilities in the smear zone, and time-dependent surcharge preloading are also considered. The solution is verified by comparing it with experimental result and numerical solution in the previous literature. Finally, a parametric study is conducted to investigate the influence of considering nonlinearity, smear zone, and non-synchronous change of hydraulic and electroosmosis permeability in void ratio. The result indicates that the average negative pore water pressure under combined electroosmosis-vacuum-surcharge preloading is larger with the consideration of nonlinear change of the soil parameters, and the consolidation rate is also faster. The presence of a smear zone decreases the consolidation rate and increases the final settlement. A slower consolidation rate is obtained for the smear zone with the large radius and the less permeable. The consolidation rate, final settlement and negative pore water pressure increase for the soils with the large value of electroosmosis permeability index. In addition, the decrease of the vertical hydraulic permeability will increase the final settlement and consolidation time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据