4.7 Article

The quasi-static axial compressive properties and energy absorption behavior of ex-situ ordered aluminum cellular structure filled tubes

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 239, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112039

关键词

Compressive properties; Energy absorption behavior; Ordered aluminum cellular structure; Thin-walled tube; Structure design; Deformation mode

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0701204, 2018YFA0702903]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the ex-situ ordered aluminum cellular structure filled tubes with different filler types, filling ratios and filling positions were fabricated by inserting the ordered aluminum cellular structure fillers into the aluminum tubes directly. The ordered aluminum cellular structure fillers were prepared by the selective laser sintering and the infiltration casting. The compressive properties and energy absorption behavior of ex-situ ordered aluminum cellular structure filled tubes were assessed by quasi-static axial compression tests. The effects of the ordered cellular structure types, filling ratios and filling positions on compressive properties and energy absorption behavior of ex-situ ordered aluminum cellular structure filled tubes were investigated. The results show that both the uniform and graded ordered aluminum cellular structures as filler materials can significantly improve the compressive properties and energy absorption behavior. Meanwhile, the compressive properties and energy absorption behavior of ex-situ ordered aluminum cellular structure filled tubes can be tailored by changing the filling ratios and positions. It is noticed that the ex-situ ordered aluminum cellular structure vertically filled the middle part of the thin-walled tubes exhibit superior compressive properties and energy absorption behavior compared with the ex-situ ordered aluminum cellular structure horizontally filled the bottom of the thin-walled tubes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据