4.5 Review

Botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of dyssynergic defaecation in adults: a systematic review

期刊

COLORECTAL DISEASE
卷 22, 期 12, 页码 1832-1841

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/codi.15120

关键词

Dyssynergia; dyssynergic defaecation; constipation; puborectalis; botulinum toxin; botox

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim Dyssynergic defaecation (DD) is characterized by inappropriate coordination of the pelvic floor muscles during defaecation, resulting in impaired stool expulsion. The mainstay of treatment is biofeedback and alternative therapies are limited in those who do not respond. This systematic review evaluated botulinum toxin type A injection (BTXA) as a treatment option for dyssynergia. Methods PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies evaluating adult patients with DD treated with BTXA injection into the puborectalis and/or external anal sphincter. All study designs, except case reports, were included in the review with no language restriction. Studies limited to patients with specific neurological diagnoses or with a follow-up period under 1 month were excluded. Study selection, assessment and data extraction were performed by two reviewers and results were synthesized narratively. Results Eleven studies (three randomized control trials) involving 248 participants were included. All studies used the transanal approach to deliver the injection, most commonly at the 3 and 9 o'clock positions using digital palpation for guidance. The most commonly used patient position was left lateral, and most studies did not use any anaesthesia. The dose of BTXA varied (Botox 12-100 units, Dysport 100-500 units), and outcomes measured were heterogeneous (global rating +/- up to five investigations). Symptomatic improvement varied between 29.2% and 100% and adverse effects occurred in 0% to 70%. Conclusion The evidence to support using BTXA for DD is poor and only covers a transanal approach. Future studies should redress these limitations: heterogeneity of design, dose and outcome measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据