4.6 Article

Investigation of the optical properties of uniform platinum, palladium, and nickel nanocrystals enables direct measurements of their concentrations in solution

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125007

关键词

UV-visible spectroscopy; Extinction coefficient; Platinum; Palladium; Nickel; Colloidal nanoparticles

资金

  1. TomKat seed grant from Stanford University
  2. School of Engineering at Stanford University
  3. Terman Faculty Fellowship
  4. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1542152]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Colloidal transition metal nanocrystals have gained increased interest in several fields because of the fascinating structural, optical, and catalytic properties obtained at the nanoscale. A thorough and systematic understanding of their characteristics could prove beneficial for different applications. Among these characteristics, the optical properties of colloidal nanoparticles are especially of interest due to the intriguing features that emerge at sub-wavelength scales, such as surface plasmon resonance. However, most research in this domain has focused on metals with absorption maxima in the visible light range, while the optical characteristics of other species remain relatively less studied. Therefore, in this work, we report on the optical properties of uniform platinum, palladium, and nickel nanocrystals, which are widely used in fields from sensors to catalysis, yet, with regard to their optical properties, remain largely uninvestigated. In particular, we measure and analyze their extinction coefficients, showing a size-dependence that can be rationalized with simple equations that relate light absorption to the diameter of the particles. The comprehension of this relationship enables a simple, time-efficient, and accurate method to measure the concentrations of metallic nanoparticles in solution with UV-vis spectroscopy, a useful property which facilitates the preparation of materials based on these colloidal nanoparticles for further research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据