4.8 Article

The EZH2-PHACTR2-AS1-Ribosome Axis induces Genomic Instability and Promotes Growth and Metastasis in Breast Cancer

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 80, 期 13, 页码 2737-2750

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-3326

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2016YFC1302103]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81572839, 81621063, 81730071, 81972616]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality [7192092, 7171005, BMU 2018JC004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aberrant activation of histone methyltransferase EZH2 and ribosome synthesis strongly associate with cancer development and progression. We previously found that EZH2 regulates RNA polymerase III-transcribed 5S ribosomal RNA gene transcription. However, whether EZH2 regulates ribosome synthesis is still unknown. Here, we report that EZH2 promotes ribosome synthesis by targeting and silencing a long noncoding RNA PHACTR2-AS1. PHACTR2-AS1 directly bound ribosome DNA genes and recruited histone methyltransferase SUV39H1, which in turn triggered H3K9 methylation of these genes. Depletion of PHACTR2-AS1 resulted in hyperactivation of ribosome synthesis and instability of ribosomal DNA, which promoted cancer cell proliferation and metastasis. Administration of PHACTR2-AS1-30nt-RNA, which binds to SUV39H1, effectively inhibited breast cancer growth and lung metastasis in mice. PHACTR2-AS1 was downregulated in breast cancer patients, where lower PHACTR2-AS1 expression promoted breast cancer development and correlated with poor patient outcome. Taken together, we demonstrate that PHACTR2-AS I maintains a H3K9 methylation-marked silent state of ribosomal DNA genes, comprising a regulatory axis that controls breast cancer growth and metastasis. Significance: These findings reveal that EZH2 mediates ribosomal DNA stability via silencing of PHAC1a2-ASI, representing a potential therapeutic target to control breast cancer growth and metastasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据