4.7 Review

Toward Neurosubtypes in Autism

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 88, 期 1, 页码 111-128

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.03.022

关键词

Autism; Bayesian modeling; Data-driven clustering; Neuroimaging; Replicability; Subtyping

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [R01MH105506, R01MH115363, 1R21MH116473-01A1]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MFE-158228, FDN-154298]
  3. National Science Foundation [EEC-1707298]
  4. Singapore National Research Foundation
  5. European Research Council [802371]
  6. Simons Foundation [SFARI 400101]
  7. Brain and Behavior Foundation (NARSAD Independent Investigator Grant) [25861]
  8. SickKids Foundation [NI17-039]
  9. National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [1304413]
  10. Azrieli Center for Autism Research
  11. Canada Research Chairs program
  12. European Research Council (ERC) [802371] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a consensus that substantial heterogeneity underlies the neurobiology of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). As such, it has become increasingly clear that a dissection of variation at the molecular, cellular, and brain network domains is a prerequisite for identifying biomarkers. Neuroimaging has been widely used to characterize atypical brain patterns in ASD, although findings have varied across studies. This is due, at least in part, to a failure to account for neurobiological heterogeneity. Here, we summarize emerging data-driven efforts to delineate more homogeneous ASD subgroups at the level of brain structure and function-that is, neurosubtyping. We break this pursuit into key methodological steps: the selection of diagnostic samples, neuroimaging features, algorithms, and validation approaches. Although preliminary and methodologically diverse, current studies generally agree that at least 2 to 4 distinct ASD neurosubtypes may exist. Their identification improved symptom prediction and diagnostic label accuracy above and beyond group average comparisons. Yet, this nascent literature has shed light onto challenges and gaps. These include 1) the need for wider and more deeply transdiagnostic samples collected while minimizing artifacts (e.g., head motion), 2) quantitative and unbiased methods for feature selection and multimodal fusion, 3) greater emphasis on algorithms' ability to capture hybrid dimensional and categorical models of ASD, and 4) systematic independent replications and validations that integrate different units of analyses across multiple scales. Solutions aimed to address these challenges and gaps are discussed for future avenues leading toward a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying ASD heterogeneity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据