4.7 Review

Chagas disease vaccine design: the search for an efficient Trypanosoma cruzi immune-mediated control

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2019.165658

关键词

Neglected disease; Chagas disease; Trypanosoma cruzi; Vaccine; Recombinant antigen; DNA-delivery system

资金

  1. Universidad de Buenos Aires [20020130100788BA]
  2. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET) [PUE-0017CO-2016]
  3. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PICT-2010-0657, PICT-20140854]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chagas disease is currently endemic to 21 Latin-American countries and has also become a global concern because of globalization and mass migration of chronically infected individuals. Prophylactic and therapeutic vaccination might contribute to control the infection and the pathology, as complement of other strategies such as vector control and chemotherapy. Ideal prophylactic vaccine would produce sterilizing immunity; however, a reduction of the parasite burden would prevent progression from Trypanosoma cruzi infection to Chagas disease. A therapeutic vaccine for Chagas disease may improve or even replace the treatment with current drugs which have several side effects and require long term treatment that frequently leads to therapeutic withdrawal. Here, we will review some aspects about sub-unit vaccines, the rationale behind the selection of the immunogen, the role of adjuvants, the advantages and limitations of DNA-based vaccines and the idea of therapeutic vaccines. One of the main limitations to advance vaccine development against Chagas disease is the high number of variables that must be considered and the lack of uniform criteria among research laboratories. To make possible comparisons, much of this review will be focused on experiments that kept many variables constant including antigen mass/doses, type of eukaryotic plasmid, DNA-delivery system, mice strain and sex, lethal and sublethal model of infection, and similar immunogenicity and efficacy assessments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据