4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Relation between composition and morphology of K(Co)MoS active phase species and their performances in hydrotreating of model FCC gasoline

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 271, 期 -, 页码 16-27

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.11.025

关键词

Selective hydrodesulphurization; CoMoS; Potassium; FCC gasoline; Thiophene; Hexene-1

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [15-33-20511]
  2. Ministry of education and science of Russian Federation [14.577.21.0152, RFMEFI57714X0152]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

K-Mo/Al2O3 and K-CoMo/Al2O3 catalysts with various amount of potassium (up to 15 wt. %) were synthesized using H3PMo12O40, CoCO3 and KOH. The catalysts were characterised by the following techniques: low-temperature N-2 adsorption, Raman spectroscopy, temperature-programmed reduction, temperature-programmed desorption of NH3, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. Synthesized catalysts were tested in hydrotreating of model fluid catalytic cracking gasoline containing 1000 ppm of sulphur from thiophene and 36 wt. % of n-hexene-1. It was found that potassium incorporation led to the strong changes in both physical-chemical characteristics and catalytic behaviour of sulphide catalysts. Using potassium favoured the growth of average slab length and sulphidation degree of metals with selective formation of CoMoS active phase. Addition of potassium also led to the partial poisoning of the active sites what resulted in decrease of catalyst activities compared with the reference Mo/Al2O3 and CoMo/Al2O3 samples. Olefin hydrogenation was more sensitive to potassium than thiophene hydrodesulphurization what resulted in the growth of the dependence of selectivity factor on potassium content in the catalysts. Obtained results allowed us to suppose that potassium partially inserts in sulphide slabs with changing the nature of active sites and probably with formation of new type of active KCoMoS sites. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据