4.4 Review

Maternal complications in molecularly confirmed diandric and digynic triploid pregnancies: single institution experience and literature review

期刊

ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS
卷 301, 期 5, 页码 1139-1145

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05515-4

关键词

Diandric triploidy; Digynic triploidy; Maternal triploidy; Paternal triploidy; Partial hydatidiform mole; Preeclampsia

资金

  1. Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education in Warsaw [501-1-21-27-18]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Assessment of the maternal complications in molecularly confirmed diandric and digynic triploid pregnancies. Methods Sonographic features, biochemical results, and clinical presentation were analyzed. Beta-hCG level was controlled after diandric triploidy. Results The study included nine diandric and twelve digynic triploid pregnancies at the mean gestational age at diagnosis of 14.9 and 18.0 weeks, respectively (p = 0.0391). Mean value of total-hCG was 979 703.6 U/ml in diandric cases and 5 455.4 U/ml in digynic ones (p < 0.000). Maternal complications occurred in 88.9% of diandric triploid pregnancies, including: thecalutein cysts (44.4%), hyperemesis gravidarum (44.4%), symptomatic hyperthyreosis (33.3%), early onset gestational hypertension (22.2%) and vaginal bleeding (11.1%). No case of proteinuria, preeclampsia or HELLP syndrome was observed. Only maternal complication observed in digynic triploidy was vaginal bleeding (50.0%). The mean time of beta-hCG normalization after diandric triploid pregnancies was 84 days (range 11-142 days). No case of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) was observed. Conclusions Maternal complications (except for vaginal bleeding) are associated with diandric triploidy. The relatively low incidence of hypertensive maternal complications and their less severe course in our cohort may be attributed to the earlier prenatal diagnosis. The frequency of GTN after diandric triploidy may be lower than previously reported.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据