4.8 Article

Comprehensive analysis of two catalytic processes to produce formic acid from carbon dioxide

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 264, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114711

关键词

Carbon utilization process; Energy analysis; Economic analysis; Environmental analysis

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2019R1I1A3A01061118]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019R1I1A3A01061118] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon utilization (CU) based formic acid (FA) process is a promising option to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) causing global warming but energy intensive resulting in a negative income effect on energy consumption. In the literature, catalytic conversion of CO2 to FA at low concentrations is focused and limited to recovery of FA with a high purity. This study presents two commercial-scale processes for catalytic production of formic acid (FA) from CO2, and conducts economic, energy and environmental analysis of them. Process B that uses an Au/TiO2 catalyst has a higher conversion by 3 mol% to 84 mol% than Process A that uses a Ru-Ph catalyst. Moreover, after catalytic conversion of CO2, Process B uses an additional amine shift reaction to recover FA with low energy consumption. Simulation of process design including CO2 conversion and separation of FA shows that Process B has a higher energy efficiency by 24.3% to 69.0% compared to Process A. However, Process A has a much lower reaction time (T-R) than Process B, so the minimum selling price of FA (US$ 1,029/t(FA)) for Process A is more cost-competitive than Process B (US$ 1,037/t(FA)) with the current petroleum-based approach. In contrast, environmental analyses show that Process B has a higher potential by 0.3 t(CO2)/t(FA) to reduce CO2 emissions. If feasible positive assumptions (reduced T-R; received carbon credits) can be met, Process B will also be techno-economically viable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据