4.5 Article

Structural and functional variations in human bronchial epithelial cells cultured in air-liquid interface using different growth media

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00190.2019

关键词

air-liquid interface; epithelium; respiratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human bronchial epithelium is an important barrier tissue that is damaged or pathologically altered in various acute and chronic respiratory conditions. To represent the epithelial component of respiratory disease, it is essential to use a physiologically relevant model of this tissue. The human bronchial epithelium is a highly organized tissue consisting of a number of specialized cell types. Primary human bronchial epithelial cells (HBEC) can be differentiated into a mucociliated tissue in air-liquid interface (ALI) cultures using appropriately supplemented media under optimized growth conditions. We compared the histology, ciliary length. and function, diffusion, and barrier properties of HBEC from donors with no respiratory disease grown in two different media, PneumaCult-ALI or Bronchial Epithelial Differentiation Medium (BEDM). In the former group. HBEC have a more physiological pseudostratified morphology and mucociliary differentiation, including increased epithelial thickness, intracellular expression of airway-specific mucin protein MUC5AC. and total expression of cilia basal-body protein compared with cells from the same donor grown in the other medium. Baseline expression levels of inflammatory mediators, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), soluble ST2, and eotaxin-3 were lower in PneumaCult-ALI. Additionally. the physiological cilia beat frequency and electrical barrier properties with transepithelial electrical resistance were significantly different between the two groups. Our study has shown that these primary cell cultures from the same donor grown in the two media possess variable structural and functional characteristics. Therefore, it is important to objectively validate primary epithelial cell cultures before experimentation to ensure they are appropriate to answer a specific scientific question.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据