4.8 Article

Fluid-Guided CVD Growth for Large-Scale Monolayer Two-Dimensional Materials

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 23, 页码 26342-26349

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c04125

关键词

two-dimensional materials; atmospheric pressure chemical deposition; computational fluid dynamics; fluid guided; precursor mixing; fluid velocity; shear stress

资金

  1. Villanova startup fund
  2. National Science Foundation CBET Fluid Dynamics Program [1511096]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists (WDTS) under the Visiting Faculty Program (VFP)
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1511096] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition (APCVD) has been used extensively for synthesizing two-dimensional (2D) materials because of its low cost and promise for high-quality monolayer crystal synthesis. However, the understanding of the reaction mechanism and the key parameters affecting the APCVD processes is still in its embryonic stage. Hence, the scalability of the APCVD method in achieving large-scale continuous film remains very poor. Here, we use MoSe2 as a model system and present a fluid guided growth strategy for understanding and controlling the growth of 2D materials. Through the integration of experiment and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis in the full-reactor scale, we identified three key parameters, precursor mixing, fluid velocity, and shear stress, which play a critical role in the APCVD process. By modifying the geometry of the growth setup to enhance precursor mixing and decrease nearby velocity shear rate and adjusting flow direction, we have successfully obtained inch-scale monolayer MoSe2. This unprecedented success of achieving scalable 2D materials through fluidic design lays the foundation for designing new CVD systems to achieve the scalable synthesis of nanomaterials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据