4.7 Article

Structural properties of polysaccharides from cultivated fruit bodies and mycelium of Cordyceps militaris

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 63-72

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.01.040

关键词

Cordyceps militaris; Polysaccharide; Structure

资金

  1. National Spark Key Program of China (the ministry of Science and Technology) [2015GA610001]
  2. Foundation of Tianjin University of Science and Technology [20120106]
  3. International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China (the ministry of Science and Technology) [2013DFA31160]
  4. Foundation of Tianjin Educational Committee [20090604]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structural properties of polysaccharides, respectively, obtained from the fermented mycelium and cultivated fruiting bodies of the Cordyceps militaris were investigated and compared in this paper. First, the crude polysaccharides were extracted from the mycelium and the fruiting bodies, respectively. The polysaccharides were successively purified by Sevag and chromatography on Sephadex G-100 column to produce two polysaccharides fractions termed CMPS-II and CBPS-II, respectively. The average molecular weights of CMPS-II and CBPS-II were 1.402 x 10(3) kDa and 1.273 x 10(3) kDa, respectively, and they were mainly composed of mannose, glucose and galactose in the mole ratios of 1:28.63:1.41 and 1:12.41:0.74, respectively, for CMPS-II and CBPS-II. Afterward, the structural features of CMPS-II and CBPS-II were investigated by a combination of chemical and instrumental analysis, such as FT-IR, periodate oxidation Smith degradation, GC-MS, NMR and methylation analysis. The results indicated that structurally, both CMPS-II and CBPS-II were 1,3-branched-galactomannoglucan that had a linear backbone of (1 -> 4)-linked a-D-glucopyranose (Glcp). Congo-red test revealed that CMPS-II and CBPS-II existed as triple-helical chains in 0.05-0.15 M NaOH solution. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据