4.4 Article

VPS13D-related disorders presenting as a pure and complicated form of hereditary spastic paraplegia

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1108

关键词

autosomal recessive hereditary spastic paraplegia; complicated form; pure form; VPS13D-related disorders

资金

  1. Research Committee for Ataxic Disease
  2. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan, JSPS KAKENHI [JP17K17772, JP18K07495]
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan
  4. [16H06279]
  5. [221S0002]
  6. [JP18kk0205001h003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Alterations of vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 13 (VPS13) family members including VPS13A, VPS13B, and VPS13C lead to chorea acanthocytosis, Cohen syndrome, and parkinsonism, respectively. Recently, VPS13D mutations were identified as a cause of VPS13D-related movement disorders, which show several phenotypes including chorea, dystonia, spastic ataxia, and spastic paraplegia. Methods We applied whole-exome analysis for a patient with a complicated form of hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) and her unaffected parents. Then, we screened the candidate genes in 664 Japanese families with HSP in Japan. Results We first found a compound heterozygote VPS13D mutation and a heterozygote ABHD4 variation in a sporadic patient with spastic paraplegia. Then, we found three patients with VPS13D mutations in two Japanese HSP families. The three patients with homozygous mutations (p.Thr1118Met/p.Thr1118Met and p.Thr2945Ala/p.Thr2945Ala) in the VPS13D showed an adult onset pure form of HSP. Meanwhile, the patient with a compound heterozygous mutation (p.Ser405Arg/p.Arg3141Ter) in the VPS13D showed a childhood onset complicated form of HSP associated with cerebellar ataxia, cervical dystonia, cataracts, and chorioretinal dystrophy. Conclusion In the present study, we found four patients in three Japanese families with novel VPS13D mutations, which may broaden the clinical and genetic findings for VPS13D-related disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据