4.8 Article

Synthesis and Properties of Stable Sub-2-nm-Thick Aluminum Nanosheets: Oxygen Passivation and Two-Photon Luminescence

期刊

CHEM
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 448-459

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.11.004

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
  2. National Key Research and Development project [2016YFF0204402]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in the university [IRT1205]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  5. Ministry of Finance
  6. Ministry of Education of PRC
  7. Royal Society
  8. Newton Fund through the Newton Advanced Fellowship award [NAF\R1\191294]
  9. U.S. Department of Energy
  10. Office of Vehicle Technologies through the Advanced Battery Material Research (BMR) program [DE-SC0012704]
  11. Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
  12. DOE Office of Science [DE-SC0012704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The high reductivity of aluminum (Al) implies the utmost difficulty in achieving oxygen-resistant, ultrathin Al nanostructures. Herein, we demonstrate that sub-2-nm-thick Al nanosheets with ambient stability can be synthesized through a facile wet-chemical approach. Selective oxygen adsorption on the (111) facets of the face-centered cubic (fcc) Al has been revealed as the reason of controlling the morphology and stability of Al nanosheets, tailoring the thickness from 18 nm to 1.5 nm. Within the (111) surface passivation, Al nanosheets have achieved satisfactory stability, ensuring the possibility to study thickness-dependent localized surface plasmon resonance from visible to near-infrared (near-IR) region, and significantly enhanced two-photon luminescence. This work demonstrates, for the first time, the feasibility in obtaining stable ultrathin nanostructures of Al metal, which paves the way toward optical applications of Al as a sustainable plasmonic material, and shows great potential in the synthesis of other active metal-based nanomaterials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据