4.8 Article

JARID1B Enables Transit between Distinct States of the Stem-like Cell Population in Oral Cancers

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 76, 期 18, 页码 5538-5549

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-3377

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA010815, F31 CA174176, P01 CA098101, R01 CA185086, P30 CA016520] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [K26 RR032714] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDCR NIH HHS [F32 DE024685, R21 DE024396, K08 DE022842] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK050306, K01 DK103953] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIH HHS [S10 OD017998, K26 OD011179] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The degree of heterogeneity among cancer stem cells (CSC) remains ill-defined and may hinder effective anti-CSC therapy. Evaluation of oral cancers for such heterogeneity identified two compartments within the CSC pool. One compartment was detected using a reporter for expression of the H3K4me3 demethylase JARID1B to isolate a JARID1B(high) fraction of cells with stem cell-like function. JARID1B(high) cells expressed oral CSC markers including CD44 and ALDH1 and showed increased PI3K pathway activation. They were distinguished from a fraction in a G(0)-like cell-cycle state characterized by low reactive oxygen species and suppressed PI3K/AKT signaling. G(0)-like cells lacked conventional CSC markers but were primed to acquire stem cell-like function by upregulating JARID1B, which directly mediated transition to a state expressing known oral CSC markers. The transition was regulated by PI3K signals acting upstream of JARID1B expression, resulting in PI3K inhibition depleting JARID1B(high) cells but expanding the G(0)-like subset. These findings define a novel developmental relationship between two cell phenotypes that may jointly contribute to CSC maintenance. Expansion of the G(0)-like subset during targeted depletion of JARID1B(high) cells implicates it as a candidate therapeutic target within the oral CSC pool. (C) 2016 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据