4.7 Article

Comparative mechanical properties between biocomposites of Epoxy and polyester matrices reinforced by hemp fiber

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.11.056

关键词

Hemp fiber; Epoxy composite; Polyester composite; Mechanical properties

资金

  1. CNPq
  2. CAPES
  3. FAPERJ

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural fibers have, in past decades, been increasingly used as reinforcement of polymer matrix composites in substitution for synthetic fibers. This work presents a comparative study on the mechanical properties of both epoxy and polyester composites reinforced with promising hemp fiber. The comparison would allow which of these thermoset matrices is more adequate for novel biocomposites to be used in technological applications. Amounts of 10, 20 and 30 vol% of continuous and aligned hemp fibers were mixed with either epoxy or polyester inside steel molds kept under pressure and cured for 24 h at room temperature. Plain epoxy and polyester plates were also fabricated for control samples. Basic characterization by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was preliminarly performed. Mechanical properties were obtained in flexural and tensile tests according to ASTM standards. Results were statistically compared by ANOVA and Tukey tests. Fracture was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. For higher amount, 30 vol% of reinforcing hemp fiber, the epoxy composites disclosed superior strength than those of polyester composites. Indeed, for epoxy composites the flexural and tensile strength, 76.7 and 50.5 MPa, respectively, are higher than corresponding 49.1 and 25.4 MPa, respectively, for polyester composites. As for the elastic modulus, the flexural of 30 vol% hemp fiber/epoxy composites, 3.8 GPa, was superior to 30 vol% hemp fiber/polyester, with 1.2 GPa. These results indicate a potential application of hemp fiber/epoxy composites as part of multilayered armor systems for personal ballistic protection. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据