4.6 Article

Runting and Stunting Syndrome Is Associated With Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Sex-Linked Dwarf Chicken

期刊

FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01337

关键词

runting and stunting syndrome; chicken; mitochondrial dysfunction; oxidative phosphorylation; ATP synthesis; vacuoles

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fund Committee National Youth Project [31401046]
  2. Guangdong Provincial Promotion Project on Preservation and Utilization of Local Breed of Livestock and Poultry and Guangdong Youth Talent Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Runting and stunting syndrome (RSS) in chicken are commonly known as frozen chicken. The disease is characterized by lower body weight and slow growth and the incidence rate is widely 5%-20% in sex-linked dwarf (SLD) chickens. However, the etiology of RSS in chickens has plagued researchers for several decades. In this study, histopathology studies demonstrated that the hepatocytes of the RSS chickens contain many mitochondria with damaged and outer and inner membrane along with vacuolar hydropic degeneration. No mtDNA mutation was detected, but our microarray data showed that RSS chickens exhibited abnormal expression of genes, many of which are involved in oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and fatty acid metabolism. In particular, nuclear gene IGF2BP3 was upregulated in RSS chickens' liver cells. The abnormal expression of these genes is likely to impair the OXPHOS, resulting in reduced ATP synthesis in the hepatocytes of the RSS chickens, which may in turn leads to poor weight gain and retarded growth or stunting of chicks. Our findings suggest that mitochondria dysfunction rather than chronic inflammation is responsible for the reduced growth and RSS in SLD chickens. Mutations in GHR have been shown to compromise mitochondrial function in SLD chickens. Since the mitochondrial damage in the RSS chicken is more severe, we suggest that extra genes are likely to be affected to exacerbate the phenotype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据