4.3 Article

Metabolic engineering of an industrial Aspergillus niger strain for itaconic acid production

期刊

3 BIOTECH
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13205-020-2080-2

关键词

Itaconic acid; Aspergillus niger; cadA; Promoters; Fed-batch fermentation

资金

  1. National Special Fund for State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Itaconic acid is a value-added organic acid that is widely applied in industrial production. It can be converted from citric acid by some microorganisms including Aspergillus terreus and Aspergillus niger. Because of high citric acid production (more than 200 g/L), A. niger strains may be developed into powerful itaconic acid-producing microbial cell factories. In this study, industrial citric acid-producing strain A. niger YX-1217, capable of producing 180.0-200.0 g/L, was modified to produce itaconic acid by metabolic engineering. A key gene cadA encoding aconitase was expressed in A. niger YX-1217 under the control of three different promoters. Analyses showed that the PglaA promoter resulted in higher levels of gene expression than the PpkiA and PgpdA promoters. Moreover, the synthesis pathway of itaconic acid was extended by introducing the acoA gene, and the cadA gene, encoding aconitate decarboxylase, into A. niger YX-1217 under the function of the two rigid short-peptide linkers L-1 or L-2. The resulting recombinant strains L-1 and L-2 were induced to produce itaconic acid in fed-batch fermentations under three-stage control of agitation speed. After fermentation for 104 h, itaconic acid concentrations in the recombinant strain L-2 culture reached 7.2 g/L, which represented a 71.4% increase in itaconic acid concentration compared with strain Z-17 that only expresses cadA. Therefore, co-expression of acoA and cadA resulted in an extension of the citric acid metabolic pathway to the itaconic acid metabolic pathway, thereby increasing the production of itaconic acid by A. niger.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据