4.5 Article

The Mechanism for HAZ Liquation of Nickel-Based Alloy 617B During Gas Tungsten Arc Welding

期刊

METALS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met10010094

关键词

nickel-based alloys; welding; thermal simulation; constitutional liquation; M23C6 carbides

资金

  1. National Natural Foundation of China [51775300, 51901113]
  2. Tribology Science Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Tribology in Tsinghua University [SKLT2015A02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanism for HAZ (heat-affected zone) liquation of alloy 617B during gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW) was investigated. Welding thermal simulation work was conducted to investigate the effects of thermal parameters (peak temperature, holding time, and thermal cycle numbers) on M23C6 carbides' evolutionary behavior in nickel-based alloy 617B. OM (optical microscopy), SEM (scanning electron microscopy), TEM (transmission electron microscopy), and SIMS (secondary ion mass spectrometry) were employed to characterize HAZ carbides. It was found that the constitutional liquation of M23C6 carbides is responsible for HAZ liquation in alloy 617B. Rapid heating meant that solute atoms released from partially dissolved M23C6 carbides did not have enough time to sufficiently diffuse into the matrix, resulting in eutectic reaction M23C6 + gamma -> liquid in the temperature range from 1250 degrees C to 1300 degrees C. In the following cooling process, the liquid phase transformed into gamma and M23C6 (or M6C) carbides simultaneously, creating a eutectic microstructure. Subsequent thermal cycles with peak temperature 1100 degrees C and proper holding time brought about a tempering effect to precipitate fine M23C6 carbides from the Cr supersaturated zone around the eutectic microstructure. Boron was found to be enriched in carbides and was expected to promote HAZ liquation by two mechanisms. No cracking caused by HAZ liquation has been found, indicating that GTAW is a suitable method for joining alloy 617B.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据