4.6 Article

Sex-Biased CHHs and Their Putative Receptor Regulate the Expression of IAG Gene in the Shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01525

关键词

CHH; eyestalk-AG-testis endocrine axis; guanylate cyclase; IAG; male sexual differentiation

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFD0900502]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31861143047]
  3. ISF-NSFC Joint Research Program [2368/18]
  4. China Agriculture Research System-48 [CARS-48]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The eyestalk-androgenic gland (AG)-testis endocrine axis is involved in male sexual differentiation of crustaceans. The insulin-like androgenic gland hormone (IAG), secreted from the AG, plays a central role in this axis, however key factors upstream the IAG are still poorly understood. Here, two crustacean hyperglycemic hormone (CHH) genes (LvCHH1 and LvCHH2) and their putative receptor guanylate cyclase (LvGC) were identified in Litopenaeus vannamei. LvCHH1 and LvCHH2 belonged to CHH subfamily I members and LvGC was a membrane-bound guanylate cyclase. They were all differentially expressed in eyestalks and gonads of males and females. RNA interference (RNAi) of either LvCHH1 or LvCHH2 increased LvIAG expression, while injection of their recombinant protein decreased LvIAG expression, indicating that LvCHH1 and LvCHH2 are inhibitory factors of LvIAG expression. Yeast two-hybrid assay showed that both LvCHH1 and LvCHH2 interacted with LvGC and their RNAi and recombinant protein injection exerted opposite regulatory effects on the transcriptional expression of LvGC. Meanwhile, knockdown of LvGC increased LvIAG expression. These results suggest that LvGC is the receptor of LvCHH1 and LvCHH2 and they are all involved in male sexual development by regulating LvIAG expression. The present study unveils missing upstream elements in the eyestalk-AG-testis endocrine axis in crustacean.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据