4.6 Article

Urchin-like Spinel MgV2O4 as a Cathode Material for Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 3681-3688

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06613

关键词

MgV2O4; urchin-like microspheres; spinel cathode; aqueous zinc-ion battery; storage mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51771071, 51602239]
  2. International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China [2016YFE0124300]
  3. Hubei Provincial Department of Education [B2019046]
  4. open fund of Collaborative Innovation Center of Green Light-weight Materials and Processing [201710A05, 201611A07]
  5. Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Green Materials for Light Industry [201710A05, 201611A07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rechargeable aqueous zinc-ion battery is a promising candidate for energy storage demands owing to its low cost, intrinsic safety, and ecofriendliness. However, existing aqueous zinc-ion batteries are far from achieving the exploration of appreciable cathode materials because multivalent ions have the strong charge repulsion with the host material and inherent sluggish kinetics during the charge and discharge process. Herein, we introduce a novel urchin-like magnesium vanadate as the cathode material for aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Specifically, the battery delivers a high capacity of 272 mA h g(-1) at 0.2 A g(-1) and an excellent long-term cycling stability with a reversible capacity of 128.9 mA h g(-1) even after 500 cycles at 4.0 A g(-1). Additionally, the calculated energy density for the MgV2O4 cathode is 171.5 W h kg(-1) at 140.6 W kg(-1) power density. These remarkable electrochemical performances are attributed to the crystal structure of urchin-like MgV2O4 with low-valence vanadium, . transforming from the order to disorder and producing a new phase during the electrochemical cycling process. This work may open an avenue for the application of low-valent vanadium-based materials for aqueous zinc-ion storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据