4.6 Article

Electrocoagulation: A Promising Method to Treat and Reuse Mineral Processing Wastewater with High COD

期刊

WATER
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w12020595

关键词

mineral processing; wastewater treatment; flotation; electrocoagulation (EC); chemical oxygen demand (COD)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51634009, 51774328, 51404300]
  2. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST [2017QNRC001]
  3. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by Hunan province of China [2018RS3011]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China [2018JJ2520]
  5. National 111 Project [B14034]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mineral processing wastewater contains large amounts of reagents which can lead to severe environmental problems, such as high chemical oxygen demand (COD). Inspired by the wastewater treatment in such industries as those of textiles, food, and petrochemistry, in the present work, electrocoagulation (EC) is applied for the first time to explore its feasibility in the treatment of wastewater with an initial COD of 424.29 mg/L from a Pb/Zn sulfide mineral flotation plant and its effect on water reuse. Typical parameters, such as anode materials, current density, initial pH, and additives, were characterized to evaluate the performance of the EC method. The results showed that, under optimal conditions, i.e., iron anode, pH 7.1, electrolysis time 70 min, 19.23 mA/cm(2) current density, and 4.1 g/L activated carbon, the initial COD can be reduced to 72.9 mg/L, corresponding to a removal rate of 82.8%. In addition, compared with the untreated wastewater, EC-treated wastewater was found to benefit the recovery of galena and sphalerite, with galena recovery increasing from 25.01% to 36.06% and sphalerite recovery increasing from 59.99% to 65.33%. This study confirmed that EC is a promising method for the treatment and reuse of high-COD-containing wastewater in the mining industry, and it possesses great potential for wide industrial applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据