4.6 Article

Rainfall Event-Duration Thresholds for Landslide Occurrences in China

期刊

WATER
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w12020494

关键词

landslide and debris flow; rainfall thresholds; China; quantile regression

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0600703]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41605084]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A rainfall threshold for landslide occurrence at a national scale in China has rarely been developed in the early warning system for landslides. Based on 771 landslide events that occurred in China during 1998-2017, four groups of rainfall thresholds at different quantile levels of the quantile regression for landslide occurrences in China are defined, which include the original rainfall event duration (E-D) thresholds and normalized (the accumulated rainfall is normalized by mean annual precipitation) (EMAP D) rainfall thresholds based on the merged rainfall and the Climate Prediction Center Morphing technique (CMORPH) rainfall products, respectively. Each group consists of four sub-thresholds in rainy season and non-rainy season, and both are divided into short duration (<48 h) and long duration (48 h). The results show that the slope of the regression line for the thresholds in the events with long durations is larger than that with short durations. In addition, the rainfall thresholds in the non-rainy season are generally lower than those in the rainy season. The E D thresholds defined in this paper are generally lower than other thresholds in previous studies on a global scale, and a regional or national scale in China. This might be due to there being more landslide events used in this paper, as well as the combined effects of special geological environment, climate condition and human activities in China. Compared with the previous landslide model, the positive rates of the rainfall thresholds for landslides have increased by 16%-20%, 10%-17% and 20%-38% in the whole year, rainy season and non-rainy season, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据