4.8 Article

p53 Integrates Temporal WDR5 Inputs during Neuroectoderm and Mesoderm Differentiation of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 465-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.039

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Eye Institute [K08EY026654]
  2. National Cancer Institute [P30CA046592]
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness
  4. Beatrice & Reymont Paul Foundation
  5. March Hoops to Beat Blindness
  6. Taubman Institute
  7. Leonard G. Miller Endowed Professorship
  8. Ophthalmic Research Fund at the Kellogg Eye Center
  9. Grossman research fund
  10. Elaine Sandman research fund
  11. Marek and Maria Spatz (endowed) research fund
  12. Greenspon research fund
  13. Dunn research fund
  14. Avers research fund
  15. Boustikakis research fund
  16. Sweiden research fund
  17. Terauchi research fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

How ubiquitous transcription factors (TFs) coordinate temporal inputs from broadly expressed epigenetic factors to control cell fate remains poorly understood. Here, we uncover a molecular relationship between p53, an abundant embryonic TF, and WDR5, an essential member of the MLL chromatin modifying complex, that regulates mouse embryonic stem cell fate. Wild-type Wdr5 or transient Wdr5 knockout promotes a distinct pattern of global chromatin accessibility and spurs neuroectodermal differentiation through an RbBP5-dependent process in which WDR5 binds to, and activates transcription of, neural genes. Wdr5 rescue after its prolonged inhibition targets WDR5 to mesoderm lineage-specifying genes, stimulating differentiation toward mesoderm fates in a p53-dependent fashion. Finally, we identify a direct interaction between WDR5 and p53 that enables their co-recruitment to, and regulation of, genes known to control cell proliferation and fate. Our results unmask p53-dependent mechanisms that temporally integrate epigenetic WDR5 inputs to drive neuroectoderm and mesoderm differentiation from pluripotent cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据